Eco Blog: dedication to Green Hauling

As California’s Drought Worsens, Residents Continue to Consume

August 1st, 2014

droughtFIAs California began to feel the worsening effects of this summers drought, Gov. Jerry Brown called for a 20% cutback on overall water use among resident. Unfortunately, residents are failing to act accordingly. In a recently updated report of statewide water use, not only has consumption failed to fall, but also residents are actually using 1% more then last month.

 

This alarming data comes on the heels of the data released last month that showed only a 5% drop in use. Compared to the new data, those look more and more favorable. This is leaving state officials stammering to find means to get residents on board with conservation efforts. The study has pointed towards two geographical areas as the worst offenders: coastal communities in Southern California and communities in the northeastern corner of the state. A $500-a-day penalty implemented last month for people using excess water for things like landscaping, car washing, and fountains is failing to inspire conservation.

 

Felicia Marcus, Chairwoman of the State Water Resources Control Board, recently commented on the ongoing failure to conserve water, saying, “Not everybody in California understands how bad this drought is … and how bad it could be. There are communities in danger of running out of water all over the state.” The board is currently looking into imposing stricter usage rules, including requiring water districts to repair leaks and working with local agencies to increase rates to heavy users.

 

While this blog usually cover topics relating to recycling and waste management, we felt it was necessary share this information with our readers. We implore everyone to remember that just because you can turn on the faucet and see water come out, doesn’t mean the drought is not affecting you. Please think twice to analyze your water use and look for ways you can cut down.

 

(Source: http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/california/California-Water-Use-Rises-Amid-Crippling-Drought–267215981.html#246934731246934731 )

SF Recycling Centers Causing Friction Among Locals

July 10th, 2014
safewayrecycle2

The recycling center at the Market Street Safeway

In San Francisco a heated battle continues to over one current recycling center that has overstayed their welcome, as well as opposition over another one looking for city approval before setting up shop.

At the Safeway located at 2020 Market St., residents and business owners had enough with the industrial sized center operated by Community Recyclers. People have grown tired of the seemingly endless line of shopping carts and overflowing trash bags lining the street up to the center, creating hefty amounts of litter, noise, and traffic congestion.

Last summer, Safeway terminated the center’s lease, but Community Recyclers opted to not leave without a fight. The center stayed open, forcing Safeway to file suit. When the dust settled, a settlement was reached that would see the center close on June 30th.

The 30th came and went, with the center still holding normal operating hours. With Community Recyclers violating a court order and facing a formal eviction, the task of enforcement falls on the shoulders of the Sheriff’s Department. According to department policy evictions take place on Wednesdays, although there has been no word as to if they have followed through.

Many of the same reasons why locals wanted the Market St. center closed are coming into play to try and stop a new center from opening on 10th and Harrison. Residents of the area came out in droves to almost unanimously oppose the planned recycling center, citing the already dangerous intersection as a less-then-ideal site for the increased foot traffic a recycling center will bring.

In the end, San Francisco is faced with a unique and challenging problem with public recycling. While recycling centers play a huge role in the illegal collection and processing of recyclables (which can cost the city around $5 million annually), the city hopes not to completely alienate people looking to help them reach the goal of zero waste.

 

(Source:  http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/nevius/article/Future-uncertain-for-2-recycling-centers-in-S-F-5600790.php#photo-6553595)

By Ethan Malone

Albertsons Settles Case Alleging Mishandling of Hazardous Waste

June 30th, 2014

Albertsons-shopAlbertsons, a grocery chain with more than a thousand locations nation-wide, has agreed to pay $3.3 million dollars to settle a case brought against them alleging stores in California mishandled the disposal of hazardous waste.

In the lawsuit, filed in the Orange County Superior Court, several government agencies accused Albertsons of illegally transporting and disposing of dangerous and possibly deadly materials including pool chemicals, batteries, and various types of over-the-counter medication. It was claimed that these products were disposed of in dumpsters meant for non-hazardous material and transported to unauthorized waste processors.

Although Albertson’s has asserted that they have done nothing wrong, they have agreed to overhaul the waste management policies and practices at all 118 California locations. The overhaul includes implementing a computerized waste management tracking system, expanding employee training on the proper handling of hazardous materials, and conducting regular internal audit. Albertsons is also required to submit progress reports over the next five years, or face further penalties.

This is quite a setback for the chain, which in the last few years has made great strides towards putting more environmentally friendly policies into action in the state where these allegations took place. In 2012, the Albertson’s location in Carpintina earned the EPA GreenChill Environmental Achievement Award for being the first grocery store in the nation to use low global warming potential refrigerants. Two stores in Santa Barbara achieved “zero waste” goals, diverting 95% of waste away from landfills. Three stores in Carlsbad, Oceanside and Alpine are currently using rooftop solar panels to power the stores.

Hopefully, whether these charges took place or not, Albertsons can use this opportunity to promote better communication and continue to strive towards an eco-friendly business model.

(Source: http://www.environmentalleader.com/2014/06/26/albertsons-to-end-waste-disposal-case-with-3-3m-payout/)

By Ethan Malone

San Francisco Looks Towards Becoming A “Zero-Waste” City by 2020

June 10th, 2014

rec_zw_bins_group3_07Adding to their long list of groundbreaking waste-reduction measures, the city of San Francisco is looking to see the fruits of their labor culminate with a complete end to all landfill contributions by the year 2020. Though it seems like quite a lofty goal for a modern metropolitan city, SF’s senior Commercial Zero Waste coordinator Jack Macy is confident that it can be reached.

Since 2002, Macy has worked towards getting some of the most progressive waste management legislation passed, including requiring construction waste to be recycled, banning plastic bags from the checkout line in grocery and retail stores, and requiring the separation of food waste and recyclables from trash. Implementing these measures contributes to San Francisco’s 80 percent compost/recycle rate, which more then doubles the national average.

JackMacy_8

Senior Commercial Zero Waste coordinator
Jack Macy

In a recent discussion with Yale Environment 360’s Cheryl Katz, Macy further explained his vision for seeing San Francisco becoming a “zero-waste” city. Macy pointed out that eliminating waste is a two way street, noting “Part of the principle of zero waste is that the local government can’t shoulder all the burden…so it’s important that we encourage consumers to take responsibility for what they buy and producer responsibility for the products they design and market.”

Another fascinating point Macy made during the interview was that changing our current waste/recycling habits requires us to take another look at discarded materials and what we consider waste. Macy believes that there is valuable material in all waste; not only in the material itself, but in the fact that re-using and recycling that waste limits the need to extract, refine, manufacture, and transport raw materials.

While Macy has experienced a significant degree of success reducing overall waste in San Francisco, it doesn’t mean there have not been roadblocks along the way. He identified the residents fear of a so-called “garbage police” checking everyone’s bins and levying fines for infractions. While Macy notes that he wants to be able to enforce the cities rules, fines will always serve as a last resort to offenders.

For more info, read the full interview here.

By Ethan Malone

The Low-Down on Lowes: Lowe’s ordered to pay $18.1 Million Settlement for Environmental Violations

May 18th, 2014

lowes-charleston-sc1-480x30236 years ago, the Love Canal neighborhood of Niagara Falls, New York, began coming under serious scrutiny as disproportionate rates of reproductive disorders (miscarriages and birth defects) among its residents sparked an investigation which disclosed that the community had been built on a former chemical waste ground used to dump over 20,000 tons of toxic waste – and the city knew it. Two years later, and multiple civic actions to pressure government to relocate residents, culminated in a declaration that the city was a “national emergency” by President Jimmy Carter, who then sanctioned government-funded relocation of the residents (Source: http://unioncity.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/alameda-county-judge-orders-lowes-to-pay-181-million-settlement-for-environmental-violations#).

The phrase history repeats itself comes to mind after the latest revelation that four Lowe’s stores in Alameda County, CA were just found guilty of illegal dumping of hazardous wastes. California law specifically states that merchants must keep hazardous waste in separate and labeled containers to minimize the chance of exposure to humans, and further, to avert dangerous chemical reactions among incompatible chemicals. However, a two-year investigation (from 2011 to 2013) of Lowe’s stores by the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office Environmental Protection Division and investigators from the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (and other state environmental regulators), unearthed a consistent practice of sending hazardous wastes to local landfills not permitted to receive those wastes (despite the fact that dumping hazardous wastes at landfills has been prohibited on the residential level for decades). Moreover, the investigation also revealed that instead of recycling compact fluorescent light bulbs and batteries solicited at store kiosks for this express purpose, the stores were illegally dumping them in their trash.  Compact fluorescent light bulbs are known to contain mercury, which is linked to cancer and other serious health hazards.

The Final Straw

California, and the Bay Area (which includes Alameda County) in particular, is especially concerned about preventing environmental damage and health hazards associated with toxic wastes – as evidenced by its local ordinances which prohibit or inhibit the generation, or diversion to landfill, of household and industrial hazardous wastes. Consequently, the civil enforcement action filed this month in Alameda County (spearheaded by the District Attorneys of Alameda, San Joaquin and Solano counties) alleges that more than 118 California Lowe’s stores have unlawfully handled and disposed of hazardous wastes ranging from pesticides, to solvents, to aerosols, to paint and colorants, in addition to electronic waste (e-waste) and other toxic, combustible and corrosive materials.

Alameda County Superior Court Judge George C. Hernandez, Jr. ordered Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC, to pay $18.1 million (part of a civil environmental prosecution settlement) of which nearly $6 million will be allocated for hazardous waste minimization projects and consumer protection environmental projects.

By: Ethan Malone

 
 
© Fast Haul. All rights reserved.
We serve the greater San Francisco Bay Area including: San Francisco County, Marin County, Alameda County, Santa Clara County, Solano County, Contra Costa County, San Mateo County, Alameda, Albany, Antioch, Atherton, Berkeley, Burlingame, Castro Valley, Concord, Corte Madera, Daly City, Danville, Dublin, El Cerrito, El Sobrante, Emeryville, Fremont, Hayward, Hercules, Kensington, Lafayette, Livermore, Martinez, Mill Valley, Montclair, Moraga, Newark, Novato, Oakland, Orinda, Pacifica, Palo Alto, Piedmont, Pittsburg, Pleasanton, Pleasant Hill, San Bruno, San Leandro, San Lorenzo, San Pablo, San Rafael, Sausalito, South San Francisco, Tiburon, Union City, Vallejo, Walnut Creek.